Inteligencia y Seguridad Frente Externo En Profundidad Economia y Finanzas Transparencia
  En Parrilla Medio Ambiente Sociedad High Tech Contacto
Frente Externo  
 
26/02/2010 | The 2nd Superpower

Alexei Bayer

Few people around the world foresaw the collapse of the Soviet Union or the demise of communism. But back in 1981, Robert Tucker, a prominent neocon and an old-school U.S. isolationist, surprised our graduate seminar at an international affairs school by suggesting not only that the Soviet empire might be on its last legs, but that if and when it crumbled it would not be such a great thing for the United States.

 

Having just emigrated from the Soviet Union, I was convinced that communism would endure forever and that the old men ruling the Kremlin were winning the Cold War. But if the Soviet Union were to disappear, I didn’t think there would be much to regret.

Tucker had a different view. “The superpowers balance one another out and each keeps the other side connected to reality,” he explained. “Think of the follies they would commit if all that power were left unchecked.”

These days, I get a sense of unreality whenever I travel around the United States. There has been an extraordinary expansion of the security establishment in the country. On each leg of a recent trip from New York to St. Louis, a federal marshal unobtrusively took up two front-row seats on a sold-out flight. Armed federal marshals on domestic flights were yet another layer of protection provided to us, after security had made us stand in line for an hour to make sure we had no shampoo bottles or nail clippers in our carry-on bags.

U.S. airports are now full of soldiers in uniform, resembling dust-covered construction workers in their desert camouflage and work boots, traveling home from foreign wars. Troops fighting overseas are yet another layer of protection for Americans, since they are “fighting terrorists over there so that we won’t have to fight them over here,” to use a ridiculous political cliche.     

All this effort — and much else that remains concealed — to keep 100 passengers on a regional flight safe. In the old days, the Soviet Union never got as much attention from the U.S. government as a rag-tag gang of international terrorists, even though the Soviets had a global network of agents, client states and a vast nuclear arsenal that could annihilate the United States in 15 minutes.

Paranoia can be a national sickness. The U.S. government has successfully scared its people, and the people have sheepishly let their freedoms be restricted.

A recent Gallup poll measuring confidence in various institutions found that U.S. Congress now stands lower in the nation’s esteem than any other institution ever. While only 11 percent trust Congress, fully 82 percent have confidence in the military. By contrast, a recent Levada Center poll found that 57 percent of Russians wouldn’t want their relatives to serve, an interesting statistic since Russia’s Defender of the Fatherland Day on Feb. 23 has turned into a watered-down, all-encompassing Men’s Day.

A similar disconnect exists in attitudes toward the police. Last year, another Levada Center poll found that only 29 percent of Russians trusted the police. More recently, that number has fallen to just 1 percent. Russian policemen are notoriously corrupt and abusive, and a horrendous increase in police crimes against citizens has dampened public opinion further. In the United States, on the other hand, the already huge proportion of those who trust their police rose by 5 percentage points over the past two years, to 59 percent. It is not a healthy sign, either, and it surely conflicts with the United States’ self-image as a nation of ragged individualists.

The Soviet Union used to overspend massively on the military and the police. The United States is now squandering its resources on similar things, ignoring real economic and political challenges that it faces. But with Russia out of the running and China still too poor to be a genuine rival, there is no one to keep official Washington sane. Its politicians seem to believe that they have a huge margin for error.

An ideological gap separates neocon Tucker and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. But if the United States goes bankrupt chasing al-Qaida, Tucker may end up agreeing with Putin, who said the collapse of the Soviet Union was the greatest tragedy of the 20th century.

**Alexei Bayer, a native Muscovite, is a New York-based economist.

The Moscow Times (Rusia)

 


Otras Notas Relacionadas... ( Records 1 to 10 of 2728 )
fecha titulo
16/06/2017 Russia, Putin, The Russian Mafia - Poison in the System (I)
15/08/2014 Geopolítica: El aislamiento ruso
10/08/2014 El gran desestabilizador
04/07/2014 With General’s Purge Chinese Leader Consolidates Power
15/06/2014 China’s Interest in Central and Eastern Europe
02/06/2014 Enfoque: La estrategia y la seguridad alimentaria China
05/05/2014 Hacia el imperio de China
02/05/2014 Máxima alerta en China tras un atentado con tres muertos y 79 heridos en Xinjiang
29/04/2014 Is Vladimir Putin a Rational Actor?
26/04/2014 Geopolítica: Los ejercicios militares y los juegos de guerra de Putin


Otras Notas del Autor
fecha
Título
06/09/2020|
21/11/2019|
14/01/2019|
04/09/2018|
27/05/2018|
31/08/2017|
22/02/2016|
15/01/2016|
20/08/2015|
22/03/2015|
24/09/2014|
03/09/2014|
12/06/2014|
25/03/2014|
17/03/2014|
12/01/2014|
12/11/2013|
05/10/2013|
01/10/2013|
14/09/2013|
07/09/2013|
21/09/2010|
05/04/2010|

ver + notas
 
Center for the Study of the Presidency
Freedom House