Inteligencia y Seguridad Frente Externo En Profundidad Economia y Finanzas Transparencia
  En Parrilla Medio Ambiente Sociedad High Tech Contacto
En Parrilla  
 
14/07/2012 | How did a Muslim case end up as a commentary on Jews?

Washington Post Staff

Michael Gerson’s July 6 op-ed column [“Making circumcision criminal”] laudably criticized a recent decision by a German court criminalizing ritual circumcision. Gerson rightly pointed to Europe’s long history of anti-Semitism.

 

But here’s what you wouldn’t know from reading the column: The German case involved a Muslim family, not a Jewish one. Gerson thus cited a ruling against a Muslim family to fashion an entire column devoted to religious freedom and prejudice vis-a-vis the Jewish community, with not the barest reference to the rising tide of Islamophobia in Europe.

Gerson could have easily discussed the ruling as it relates to both the Jewish and Muslim communities or, at a minimum, just acknowledged that the family directly affected by this ruling was Muslim.

 

Washington Post (Estados Unidos)

 



Otras Notas del Autor
fecha
Título
13/11/2014|
16/02/2013|
15/01/2013|
14/01/2013|
13/01/2013|
21/12/2012|
16/12/2012|
16/06/2012|
08/09/2011|
08/09/2011|
08/02/2011|
25/09/2010|
24/09/2008|
24/09/2008|
18/09/2008|
18/09/2008|
17/03/2008|
27/09/2006|

ver + notas
 
Center for the Study of the Presidency
Freedom House