31/08/2015 | Democratic Contenders Make Their Case to Party Leaders
Real Clear Politics Staff
One candidate wants everyone to relax over those emails. A second is convinced he can start a political revolution. Another demands more debates. The other hopes you remember who he is.
What began
as an orderly quorum to rally Democrats for the 2016 general election spiraled
on Friday into a chaotic pageant of candidates slamming debate schedules,
assuaging fears over emails, lambasting Donald Trump and demanding political
revolution.
Four of the
five Democratic candidates for president addressed the Democratic National
Committee members and leaders at the party’s summer meeting in Minneapolis,
each seeking something different.
The
three-day confab is a key forum for the Democratic candidates to garner
establishment support for their campaigns. Their speeches on Friday evinced
tensions within the party and a wide range of interests. But one battle line
was clear: there’s the establishment wing of the party, and there’s everyone
else.
Here’s what
each of the candidates aimed to prove at the DNC summer meeting, in the order
that they spoke.
Lincoln
Chafee: The former Rhode
Island governor and senator, who has the mild demeanor of a mid-level manager,
is polling at an unenviable 0.5%.
So Chafee spent most of his
brief speech reminding the Democratic Party who he is. He
boasted of his qualifications, telling the audience that as a prescient senator
from Rhode Island in the early 2000s he voted against the Iraq War, warned of
the dangers of climate change and supported a bipartisan immigration bill.
Plus, he has
never been accused of a major scandal. “And all through these 30 years of
public service, I’ve had no scandal,” Chafee said. “I’m proud of that.”
Hillary
Clinton: The Democratic frontrunner,
firmly in the lead for the nomination with nearly 50% in an average of recent
national polls, aimed to assure the DNC’s leadership that she is the strongest
candidate to rebuild the party after bad losses in the 2010 and 2014 midterms.
She vowed on
Friday to help rebuild a Democratic Party whose ranks have been thinned by
losses at the local and state level, telling top leaders of the Democratic
National Committee that her campaign will help Democrats “win up and down the
ticket.”
“I’m
building an organization in all 50 states with hundreds of thousands of
volunteers who will help Democrats win races up and down the ticket, not just
the presidential campaign,” Clinton said. “You know, in 2010 Republicans routed
us on redistricting, not because they won Congress but because they won state
legislatures. It’s time to rebuild our party from the ground up. And if you
make me the nominee that’s exactly what I’ll do.”
Meanwhile,
her surrogates rounded up super-delegates at the DNC three-day meeting in an effort
to build up a bulwark of support before the primary contests next year. Her
goal is to assure Democrats uneasy after a rough August of press around her use
of a personal email server.
Clinton also told reporters
after her speech that the obsession with her emails is a passing fad. “I’m not frustrated,” she said in response to a reporter’s question, who
asked her how she is feeling about a kerfuffle that has damaged her
trustworthiness among voters. “I’m just trying to explain for people who have
never had to follow this before that is is complicated. There’s nothing unique
about [the] process being conducted around my emails.”
Clinton,
whose Priorities USA super PAC was trailing behind Jeb Bush’s fundraising
efforts by nearly $100 million as of June, compared high-dollar fundraisers to
the wealthy industrial magnates of old. “The robber barons of the late-19th
century handed public officials bags of cash,” Clinton said. “Now we have
secret unaccountable money that distorts our elections and drowns out the
voices of everyday Americans.”
The Republican Party, Clinton
said, is scrambling over itself to look backwards. “The party of
Lincoln has become the party of Trump,” she said.
The
Democrats, on the other hand: “We’re building something that will last long
after next November,” she said.
Martin
O’Malley: O’Malley, the
former governor of Maryland, has had the most trouble gaining momentum in the
race despite months of campaigning and 15 years as an executive first in
Baltimore and then in the Annapolis statehouse.
What’s more, the governor’s
impassioned calls in primetime national television interviews for more
Democratic debates have gone entirely unheeded. DNC chair Debbie
Wasserman-Schultz has repeatedly defended the debate rules, which limit the
number of debates to six and prohibit candidates from participating in any
others.
That may
explain why O’Malley delivered a barn-burning speech attacking the Democratic
establishment for limiting the number of debates.
“The
Republicans stand before the nation, malign our President’s record of
achievements, denigrate women and immigrant families, double-down on
trickle-down, and tell their false story,” O’Malley said. “We respond with
crickets, tumbleweeds, and a cynical move to delay and limit our own Party
debates.”
And
then—with Wasserman-Schultz standing feet away from O’Malley—the kicker.
“This is
totally unprecedented in our party,” O’Malley continued. “This sort of rigged
process has never been attempted before. Whose decree is it? Where did it come
from? To what end? For what purpose? What national or party interest does this
decree serve?”
The Sanders
section of the crowd roared their enthusiasm.
“We are the
Democratic Party, not the undemocratic Party,” O’Malley continued. “Our party
must not cower from this debate, we must engage the debate.”
When the
speech was over, Wasserman-Schultz gave O’Malley a terse handshake. “Thank you,
Governor O’Malley,” she said.
Bernie
Sanders: The Vermont
Senator has convinced much of the Democratic base that he’s the strongest
candidate for the job. The next big step for his campaign began on Friday, with
the Independent from Vermont aiming to convince the Democratic leadership that
he is the best candidate for the Democratic nomination.
At the heart
of Sanders’ message: Clinton can’t win the same grassroots support he can.
“Democrats
will not retain the White House—will not regain the Senate or the U.S. House of
Representatives, will not be successful in dozens of governors races all across
this country—unless we generate excitement and momentum and produce a huge
voter turnout,” Sanders said.
Sanders
offered somber advice for the party heads. But he was more polite than
O’Malley. “With all due respect, and I do not mean to insult anyone here, that
turnout—that enthusiasm—will not happen with politics as usual.”
He also
aimed some subtle jabs at Hillary Clinton, reminding his audience that he voted
against the Iraq War (Clinton voted for it), and he opposes the Keystone
Pipeline and the Trans Pacific Partnership (which Clinton has declined to take
a stance on).
Jim Webb: The former senator for Virginia, who is at 1% in national polls,
was the only candidate to skip the DNC meeting. Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz
explained that Webb is “taking his daughter to college.”
Webb’s
campaign, however, added another perspective. “His daughter off to college,
yes,” spokesman Craig Crawford in an email to TIME. “But also think, just my
opinion, you don’t have to read Machiavelli in his native language to
understand that the DNC has picked their nominee. The DNC/HRC [Hillary Rodham Clinton]
hookup is a shotgun wedding with no need for bullets.”
Also, Crawford told the IJReview
that Webb talking to the DNC is “about as useful as sticking one’s hand into a
wood chipper.”
By July 2016, the party will
have chosen its candidate for president, and the DNC hopes that the losing
candidates will fall in line. To hear the DNC leadership tell it, that won’t be
a problem. “We are very happy with the cooperation and thank the candidates for
the cooperation that we’ve seen from them to date,” Wasserman-Schultz said at
the end of her prepared remarks Friday morning. “On to victory in 2016, my
fellow Democrats, thank you so much!”