How can we plunder the spoils from this rich and remote territory, our common heritage?.
The deep
sea is in danger of turning into an invisible wild west. On Sunday, a UN
deadline for finalising regulations over deep-sea mining in international
waters expired without agreement. The resulting limbo now gives countries the
green light to apply for mining licences — and could spark an ill-advised rush
to the ocean floor in search of minerals linked to the green energy transition.
The bid
to plunder one of the least explored territories on the planet should be
reconsidered, given the potentially irreversible impact on marine habitats.
Stripping the seabed also risks disturbing stores of carbon locked away for
millennia, with unknown consequences for a jittery climate. The vast, cold,
lightless ocean floor, with crushing pressures that can be more than a thousand
times those on land, has been quietly eyed for its extractive promise since the
1960s.
One draw
is the Clarion-Clipperton Zone, an area spanning at least 4.5mn square
kilometres in the equatorial Pacific. The abyssal plain, more than 4km down, is
studded with trillions of potato-sized “polymetallic nodules” containing
manganese, nickel, copper and cobalt, which are used in rechargeable batteries
for electric vehicles. The nodules build up around small objects such as shells
or teeth over millions of years.
The
region also features seamounts, or underwater mountains, draped in metal-heavy
crusts; and sulphide ores laid down around hot, deep-sea vents. The crusts are
rich in precious metals such as platinum and molybdenum; the ores contain
copper, gold and silver. All are sought-after commodities in electronics,
construction and transportation. But
these minerals are embedded in a marine infrastructure, built up over millennia
and longer, which supports a mostly unwritten inventory of deep-sea life. Known
inhabitants include sponges, sea cucumbers, octopi and xenophyophores, strange
single-celled creatures the size of tennis balls.
Nematode
worms and crustaceans nestle in the soft sea mud. Deep-sea mining would destroy
these creatures and their habitats. Recovering the nodules involves skimming
off the top layer of the sea floor; separating the nodules from the mud;
pumping the nodules through a hose to an offshore vessel; and then pumping the
remnants back in the sea.
Kirsten
Thompson, an ecologist at Exeter University who has written reports on deep-sea
mining with Greenpeace, questions whether the minerals really are as critical
to the green revolution as portrayed, and argues against tearing into an
environment we don’t understand. “Vast areas of the seabed might be changed
forever, and we can’t restore it once it’s lost,” she tells me.
One
downside could be losing microbes with medicinal potential; one marine-derived
molecule, salinosporamide, is being trialled as a treatment for brain
cancer. The nodule-nabbers remain
undeterred. In June 2021, the small state of Nauru informed the International
Seabed Authority that it wanted to start mining; its application triggered the
two-year countdown. The clock has run out; ISA will meet this month to discuss
the next steps.
Norway,
China and India favour deep-sea extraction; India is already exploring options
in the nodule-rich Indian Ocean that promise self-sufficiency in nickel and
cobalt. France and the UK hold exploration licences, as permitted by ISA, but
do not currently support commercial mining, a stance that several other
European countries share. Advocates argue that scraping minerals off the sea
floor could break China and Russia’s control over critical raw materials; and
that it can replace land mining, which is haunted by issues such as
deforestation, child labour and the displacement of communities. But it seems
optimistic to think that terrestrial mining will stop if costlier deep-sea
mining starts.
Neither
do issues of social justice dissolve at the bottom of the ocean: it is unclear
how spoils will be shared, given the international seabed is the common
heritage of humankind. More pragmatically, any industry needs customers — and
companies such as BMW, Volvo and Samsung have pledged to keep minerals sourced
in this way out of their supply chains.
Long-term,
it seems wiser to try to break the global dependence on rare commodities than
to perpetuate it. Research into new battery technologies is paying dividends;
Tesla is already using cobalt-free batteries. There is a growing call for
improved recycling. Given the unknown risks and uncertain benefits, deep-sea
mining might prove a tricky concept to keep afloat.