The influence of private military organizations is set to increase in the coming decades.
The 21st
century has seen a resurgence of powerful non-state armed forces. Prominent
companies like the Wagner group have reshaped modern warfare. States will
struggle to curb the growing influence of these groups.
On June
26, 1998, then United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan addressed the
Ditchley Foundation’s annual conference in the United Kingdom. He proposed that
private security firms, like those that had recently helped restore the elected
president in Sierra Leone, might provide the UN with the rapid reaction
capacity it needs. He recalled considering hiring a private firm during the
Rwandan refugee crisis in Goma to separate fighters from refugees. But he
concluded that “the world may not be ready to privatize peace.”
Twenty-five
years later, and after many irregular conflicts, perhaps the world is ready.
Private militias and contractor groups are increasingly present on the
international scene, alongside – or in opposition to – regular armies.
The long
history of mercenary forces
In 1648,
the Thirty Years’ War came to an end with the Peace of Westphalia. European
powers signed two treaties that not only addressed territorial disputes and
religious principles but also established the concept of the absolute state.
The agreements established the foundation of the modern international system,
with each state having exclusive sovereignty over its territory.
Since
then, nations and their governments – whether democratic, autocratic,
monarchical or republican – have had a monopoly on the use of force. This
change catalyzed the establishment of permanent standing armies, marking a
departure from the pre-1648 norm of depending on companies of fortune. In the
fragmented societies of the Middle Ages, where strong governments were absent
and various political actors thrived, mercenaries had flourished, turning war
into a lucrative profession.
Warfare
shifted from being an intrastate affair to an interstate one. Laws and codes
were established to regulate it, and states actively opposed mercenaries,
outlawing them as swiftly as possible. The 20th century epitomized this
Westphalian ethos.
The
post-Westphalian order
The
zenith of the Westphalian era was followed by an implosion, hastened by the
advent of the technological century and globalization. While the concept of the
state with clearly defined territories endured, the internet revolutionized the
traditional concepts of borders. In this new world, many governments have begun
to show signs of vulnerability. The focus is shifting back from interstate wars
to intrastate conflicts.
Amid
this weakening of national sovereignty and the emergence of voids in
governance, professional soldiers, now referred to as contractors, have started
to resurface. These mercenaries, often employed by multinational corporations,
are enlisted as supplements to traditional armies, with their services
terminated upon mission completion. Their roles are multifaceted: they provide
external and internal security, engage in warfare, secure local leadership and
even become an extension of that leadership’s armed forces. They also oversee
crucial infrastructure like oil wells and mines, and train local forces.
This
complex landscape is not solely composed of contractors. There are also other
non-state combatants. In some regions, governments have effectively dissolved,
giving way to fragmented entities. When a state monopoly on force is
impossible, it is replaced by an oligopoly. In these murky areas, new actors
emerge, like in medieval times. They seize control of what the state has
abandoned, managing it through violence and becoming political forces in their
own right. This phenomenon is evident in places like Somalia, Libya, Lebanon
and Yemen, where governments are weak and militias operate unchecked.
Occasionally, as in the case of Hezbollah in Lebanon, these groups even provide
basic services to citizens.
In these
undefined spaces, militias and groups of local and foreign contractors move and
proliferate, occasionally overlapping or merging, but always driven by the
pursuit of profit.
The
spread of private military companies
In
recent years, one company has notably drawn global attention: the Russian
Wagner group, led by Yevgeny Prigozhin until his death in August 2023. Wagner
has been involved in unconventional operations, first in Syria, alongside the
Russian armed forces, and then on its own across Africa, particularly in Libya
and the Sahel region. French and American special forces have had several
encounters with the company, often under tense circumstances.
In
Libya, Wagner gained notoriety during the siege of Tripoli by Field Marshal
Khalifa Haftar in 2019. The group supported the Libyan National Army (LNA),
significantly enhancing its capabilities and tipping the conflict in Field
Marshal Haftar’s favor. It was only the substantial intervention of Turkish
forces – both regular troops and Syrian irregulars – that prevented Tripoli’s
imminent fall.
However,
Wagner is not the only group of its kind. In Russia alone, throughout the 1990s
groups like the Antiterror Orel Group, Ruscorp, Moran Security Group and the
Slavonic Corps emerged. These contractors operated not just in Russia but also
in the Middle East and Africa, embodying the so-called Gerasimov doctrine,
which emphasizes the importance of irregular forces and information warfare.
This approach aligns with the ancient strategy of maskirovka – achieving
objectives through deception, confusion and instability.
The U.S.
has also been a pioneer of private military companies in the new millennium.
Erik Prince’s Blackwater (now Academi), Triple Canopy, Titan Corporation and
DynCorp are among the most prominent. There are similar organizations all over
the world.
Nation-states
and their armies now face new, elusive competitors: private military companies
that operate covertly and are often employed by governments for sensitive
operations, particularly those scrutinized by public opinion. Between October
2001 and August 2021, 2,402 U.S. soldiers died in Afghanistan, compared to at
least 3,500 U.S. contractors, yet the latter received far less attention.
The
proliferation of contractors in this unstable, fragmented world is unsurprising
given their typically higher salaries. In 2007, during one of the most critical
phases of U.S. operations in Iraq, an Army sergeant earned $140 to $190 a day,
while private guards from Blackwater or DynCorp made over $1,200 a day. In
Afghanistan, contractors accounted for none of the personnel at the mission’s
start in 2001, gradually rising to 56 percent by 2010. In Iraq, the number grew
from 4 percent in 2003 to 53 percent in 2009.
Scenarios
Less
likely: Regulation
Efforts
have been made in the past to regulate private military companies, but these
have largely been national rather than international initiatives. For instance,
Article 359 of the Russian Criminal Code, introduced in 1996, prohibits
civilians from accepting rewards for fighting abroad, effectively outlawing
mercenary activities. In the U.S., legislation such as the Special Maritime and
Territorial Jurisdiction Act, the Patriot Act, the Military Extraterritorial
Jurisdiction Act and the Uniform Code of Military Justice includes provisions
to control contractors overseas. However, these laws are not applicable to
foreign mercenaries.
The UN
could attempt to legislate mercenaries worldwide with a global agreement. But
the likelihood of this happening is minimal, especially considering the
resistance from permanent Security Council members like Russia, who benefit
from the use of private military companies.
More
likely: Status quo
It is
certainly more likely that nothing will be done, and that private military
companies will continue to expand in a world increasingly characterized by
fragmentation and a shift toward multipolarity. This change marks a stark
contrast to the bipolar world of the 20th century. Contemporary wars have
evolved from major regular clashes to hybrid conflicts that are complex and
difficult to categorize and resolve. An important factor in this new era of
conflict is the growing use of artificial intelligence and other emerging
technologies in both physical and cyber warfare.
This
scenario suggests a future marked by chaos and a lack of unified international
governance. The rules of international politics will no longer be dictated by a
single power, leading to a more unpredictable and fragmented global landscape.
***For
industry-specific scenarios and bespoke geopolitical intelligence, contact us
and we will provide you with more information about our advisory services.
https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/private-military-companies/
****Federica
Saini Fasanotti is a military historian and specialist in counterinsurgency.
Her fieldwork and research have covered, among others, Afghanistan, Libya,
Ethiopia and Somalia, and her latest book is “La Forma della Guerra” (“The
Shape of the War”) (Historical Office of the General Staff, Italian Ministry of
Defense, 2022).
She is
an expert on the role of the military in African colonies. She received her
doctorate from the University of Milan. As a trained nurse, Dr. Saini
Fasanotti’s dissertation focused on the controversial relationship between
fascism and the Italian Red Cross. Following her studies, she moved to Rome,
where she worked actively with the Central Historical Office of the Italian
Army and the Historical Office of the Italian Ministry of Defense.
For
seven years (2016-2023) she was a nonresident fellow in the Center for 21st
Century Security and Intelligence at The Brookings Institution. She has also
been a guest lecturer at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis and a frequent
speaker at military history conferences and congresses.
Her
essays and articles have been published in many historical and geopolitical
journals. She developed the series “The History of Fascism” (2006) for
Rai-National Italian Television, as well as “The Second World War” (2009),
distributed by Il Corriere della Sera, the leading Italian newspaper.
Dr.
Saini Fasanotti’s books include: “Violated Joy: Crimes against Italians
1940-1946” (Ares Editore, 2006); “Ethiopia 1936-1940: Colonial
Counterinsurgency through the Sources of the Italian Army” (Historical Office
of the Italian Army, 2010); “Libya 1922-1931: The Italian Counterinsurgency”
(Historical Office of the Italian Army, 2012); “Military History of
Afghanistan: From Durrani’s Empire to Resolute Support Mission” (Mursia
Editore, 2014), “Vincere! The Italian Royal Army’s Counterinsurgency Operations
in Africa, 1922-1940” (Naval Institute Press, 2020).
She has
consulted on Libya for the Terna Group, the first grid operator for electricity
transmission in Europe. She has also collaborated with the Pentagon.