“Every time we turn our heads the other way when we see the law flouted, when we tolerate what we know to be wrong, when we close our eyes and ears to the corrupt because we are too busy or too frightened, when we fail to speak up and speak out, we strike a blow against freedom and decency and justice.” ― Robert F. Kennedy
Question: When a
self-described "informal" Army Regulation 15-6 investigation
is convened by retired military leadership and many employees then say that
they want to remain anonymous for fear of retribution because they believe that
the leadership has shown a propensity to retaliate against those that speak out
or against the leadership, what should be the next step?
Does
a very real feeling among a protected group--a "federally-recognized
class"-- that leadership practices borderline (if not enters into open)
discrimination, with organization members feeling very apprehensive about
raising specific allegations for fear of retribution, mean that those even
higher in the command leadership (i.e.: flag officers) should become actively
involved?
If
so, how?
Also, what does it mean if the
senior-most officials are made aware of the problems but choose not to become
involved, despite recurring complaints which in fact may only be a proverbial
tip of an iceberg of even greater lawbreaking (i.e.: gross violations of human rights abroad or of the civil
rights of federal employees)?
And
if they don't, what does that mean about their leadership skills?
Then
add to that a situation where several current or past employees are allowed to
operate with impunity, causing significant angst after several senior leaders
were not held accountable for their actions, and also were unchallenged for
using derogatory and offensive language with colleagues, as well as
highly-inappropriate sexual gestures when others spoke in meetings.
Or
when contracts are awarded--for significant amounts of money with very little
in the way of deliverables having been given--to outsiders based on their
personal relationships with senior-most staff of the organization in question.
Or
when the person charged with conducting the AR 15-6 tells a witness that he is
under no illusions that there will be any changes resulting from his work, as
it was commissioned by the institution's retired army leadership, that the
results will be handled at that leadership's discretion and that they are not
binding.
And
what possible conclusions can one come to given the fact that the investigator
himself agrees with the potential witness that the institution's leadership was
well versed in DoD bureaucratic intricacies, and thus is able to make
themselves appear to be highly effective and efficient, despite serious
problems of mismanagement and abuse of authority?
In a "theoretical" scenario
such as the one outlined above, surely the use of an AR 15-6 investigation
would be not unlike Vito Corleone being able to appoint the district attorney
charged with investigating The Family, no?
Especially if fellow serving and retired military officers, rather than
saluting military strategist Col. John Boyd's roll call, "To Be or To Do," engage in the ancient Old World
tradition of omertà.
--
"Judge not a man by the quality of his answers but by the
quality of his questions." -- Voltaire
fecha |
Título |
28/02/2023| |
|
01/12/2022| |
|
11/11/2022| |
|
19/03/2022| |
|
23/09/2020| |
|
05/03/2020| |
|
17/01/2020| |
|
05/06/2018| |
|
27/03/2018| |
|
21/02/2018| |
|
22/04/2017| |
|
17/02/2017| |
|
17/12/2016| |
|
14/09/2016| |
|
07/08/2016| |
|
27/03/2016| |
|
22/03/2016| |
|
22/03/2016| |
|
11/03/2016| |
|
15/02/2016| |
|
20/09/2015| |
|
20/09/2015| |
|
07/09/2015| |
|
03/09/2015| |
|
20/01/2015| |
|
18/12/2014| |
|
09/12/2014| |
|
18/11/2014| |
|
06/11/2014| |
|
01/10/2014| |
|
17/09/2014| |
|
06/09/2014| |
|
14/05/2014| |
|
12/03/2014| |
|
04/02/2014| |
|
19/12/2013| |
|
03/11/2013| |
|
25/10/2013| |
|
10/10/2013| |
|
29/08/2013| |
|
27/06/2013| |
|
19/05/2013| |
|
08/05/2013| |
|
08/05/2013| |
|
02/05/2013| |
|
20/03/2013| |
|
23/02/2013| |
|
23/02/2013| |
|
25/01/2013| |
|
15/06/2012| |
|
26/05/2012| |
|
04/05/2012| |
|
28/04/2012| |
|
17/04/2012| |
|
01/11/2011| |
|
04/07/2011| |
|
04/07/2011| |
|
11/04/2011| |
|
07/02/2011| |
|
24/01/2011| |
|
14/12/2010| |
|
21/11/2010| |
|
15/09/2010| |
|
09/08/2010| |
|
18/07/2010| |
|
01/07/2010| |
|
11/06/2010| |
|
06/06/2010| |
|
13/01/2010| |
|
29/10/2009| |
|
24/09/2009| |
|
03/09/2009| |
|
02/09/2009| |
|
29/08/2009| |
|
25/07/2009| |
|
25/07/2009| |
|
25/07/2009| |
|
25/07/2009| |
|
01/04/2009| |
|
12/03/2009| |
|
12/03/2009| |
|
16/11/2008| |
|
16/11/2008| |
|
14/11/2008| |
|
14/11/2008| |
|
18/09/2008| |
|
18/09/2008| |
|
13/08/2008| |
|
13/08/2008| |
|
28/01/2008| |
|
17/01/2008| |
|
30/12/2007| |
|
16/12/2007| |
|
02/12/2007| |
|
01/12/2007| |
|
06/10/2007| |
|
12/09/2007| |
|
17/06/2007| |
|
17/06/2007| |
|
17/06/2007| |
|
17/06/2007| |
|
17/06/2007| |
|
17/06/2007| |
|
21/05/2007| |
|
21/05/2007| |
|
06/04/2007| |
|
28/03/2007| |
|
12/01/2007| |
|
12/01/2007| |
|
18/12/2006| |
|
18/12/2006| |
|
22/09/2006| |
|
22/09/2006| |
|
03/08/2006| |
|
01/08/2006| |
|
23/02/2006| |
|
08/10/2005| |
|
18/08/2005| |
|
22/07/2005| |
|
15/07/2005| |
|
12/07/2005| |
|
23/06/2005| |
|
14/06/2005| |
|
25/05/2005| |
|
26/04/2005| |
|
26/04/2005| |
|
29/03/2005| |
|
29/03/2005| |
|
19/02/2005| |
|
19/02/2005| |
|
16/02/2005| |
|
16/02/2005| |
|
15/02/2005| |
|
15/02/2005| |
|
11/02/2005| |
|
11/02/2005| |
|
09/02/2005| |
|
09/02/2005| |
|
09/02/2005| |
|
09/02/2005| |
|
06/02/2005| |
|
06/02/2005| |
|
04/02/2005| |
|
04/02/2005| |
|
04/02/2005| |
|
02/02/2005| |
|
02/02/2005| |
|
02/02/2005| |
|
31/01/2005| |
|
31/01/2005| |
|
28/01/2005| |
|
28/01/2005| |
|
25/01/2005| |
|
25/01/2005| |
|
25/01/2005| |
|
25/01/2005| |
|
24/01/2005| |
|
24/01/2005| |
|
18/01/2005| |
|
18/01/2005| |
|
14/01/2005| |
|
14/01/2005| |
|
13/01/2005| |
|
13/01/2005| |
|
11/01/2005| |
|
11/01/2005| |
|
11/01/2005| |
|
11/01/2005| |
|
11/01/2005| |
|
11/01/2005| |
|
06/01/2005| |
|
06/01/2005| |
|
04/01/2005| |
|
04/01/2005| |
|
24/12/2004| |
|
24/12/2004| |
|
22/12/2004| |
|
22/12/2004| |
|
22/12/2004| |
|
22/12/2004| |
|
14/12/2004| |
|
14/12/2004| |
|
06/12/2004| |
|
06/12/2004| |
|
02/12/2004| |
|
02/12/2004| |
|
30/11/2004| |
|
30/11/2004| |
|
23/11/2004| |
|
23/11/2004| |
|
20/11/2004| |
|
20/11/2004| |
|
12/10/2004| |
|
12/10/2004| |
|
24/09/2004| |
|
24/09/2004| |
|
27/06/2003| |
|
27/06/2003| |
|
20/06/2003| |
|
20/06/2003| |
|
03/06/2003| |
|
03/06/2003| |
|
07/05/2003| |
|
07/05/2003| |
|
06/05/2003| |
|
06/05/2003| |
|
24/04/2003| |
|
24/04/2003| |
|
16/04/2003| |
|
16/04/2003| |
|
16/04/2003| |
|
16/04/2003| |
|
10/04/2003| |
|
10/04/2003| |
|
09/04/2003| |
|
09/04/2003| |
|
02/04/2003| |
|
02/04/2003| |
|
27/03/2003| |
|
27/03/2003| |
|
21/03/2003| |
|
21/03/2003| |
|
20/03/2003| |
|
20/03/2003| |
|
17/03/2003| |
|
17/03/2003| |
|
15/03/2003| |
|
15/03/2003| |
|
03/03/2003| |
|
03/03/2003| |
|
22/02/2003| |
|
22/02/2003| |
|
17/02/2003| |
|
17/02/2003| |
|
07/02/2003| |
|
07/02/2003| |
|
04/02/2003| |
|
04/02/2003| |
|
01/02/2003| |
|
01/02/2003| |
|
30/01/2003| |
|
30/01/2003| |
|
28/01/2003| |
|
28/01/2003| |
|
22/01/2003| |
|
22/01/2003| |
|
15/01/2003| |
|
15/01/2003| |
|
26/12/2002| |
|
26/12/2002| |
|
24/12/2002| |
|
24/12/2002| |
|
22/12/2002| |
|
22/12/2002| |
|
13/12/2002| |
|
13/12/2002| |
|
13/12/2002| |
|
13/12/2002| |
|
01/12/2002| |
|
01/12/2002| |
|
06/10/2002| |
|
06/10/2002| |
|
04/10/2002| |
|
04/10/2002| |
|
28/09/2002| |
|
28/09/2002| |
|