Inteligencia y Seguridad Frente Externo En Profundidad Economia y Finanzas Transparencia
  En Parrilla Medio Ambiente Sociedad High Tech Contacto
Inteligencia y Seguridad  
 
14/07/2011 | Airport delays could be cut by security overhaul

David Millward

Passengers could be spared the chore of removing shoes, belts and having to unpack their laptops every time they go through airport security, under measures to be announced today.

 

Sweeping changes will give airports greater flexibility to use technology to carry out the inspections which infuriate millions of people every day.

Within Whitehall there is a concern that airports are forced to go through a checklist of security measures by rote.

This checklist, which demands a specified proportion of passengers remove their shoes and insist that all computers are removed from carry-on luggage, will be scrapped.

The plans, which will be unveiled to MPs by Philip Hammond, the Transport Secretary, will encourage airports to invest in new screening devices to cut the time needed to get through to the departure lounge.

Currently major airports face financial penalties -in the form of rebates to airlines – if the time taken to get through security is too long.

“What we are looking for is a better security outcome and we want this done in a more passenger-friendly way,” Theresa Villiers, the aviation minister told the Daily Telegraph.

The British Government has been lobbying the European Union to ease its insistence that every passenger must pass through a metal detector. believing that a new generation of body scanners can do the job as efficiently, if not more so.

While ministers believe the EU will take some persuasion, they feel there is some room to overhaul how other security checks are carried out without putting passengers at risk.

Much of the technology is being developed, for example shoe-scanners are already in use at Brussels.

They have already also been tested in the United States, where the Transport Security Administration is also moving away from what it describes as a “one size fits all” approach.

Earlier this year the International Air Transport Association, the body representing more than 300 major airlines, unveiled its vision of how security would work in the future at its annual conference in Singapore.

The proposals to streamline security will be unveiled by the Government at the same time as it publishes proposals to improve airport efficiency, drawn up by the South East Airports Taskforce, a body representing the industry and senior DfT officials shortly after the election.

Having ruled out building a third runway at Heathrow, the new Government set up the group, to make airports “better not bigger”.

Ministers have accepted its call for a trial overhaul of how Heathrow’s runways are used when flights are disrupted by, for example, bad weather or ash.

The change would mean that instead of each runway being allocated for departures and the other for arrivals, one would be allowed to hand both to ease the backlog.

Immigration will be streamlined with greater co-operation between airports and the UK Border Agency, aimed at cutting the delays faced by passengers getting in the country. "Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted airports play a vital role in supporting the UK economy. Improving the reliability of these airports, particularly Heathrow, was a priority for the Taskforce,” Ms Villiers said.

Jim McAuslan, general secretary of the British Airline Pilots' Association, welcomed the reforms.

"Pilots are part of the solution to airline security, not part of the problem," he said. "It is frankly bizarre that the professionals responsible for safely flying hundreds of passengers every day are currently treated with the same degree of suspicion as high-risk passengers.

"‘Airport security is important, there’s no doubt about that. But this blanket, one-size-fits-all approach is too simplistic and is infuriating to passengers and crew alike.

"‘Pilots are routinely held up at security and, like passengers, have their water and other items confiscated. Given the responsibility they are entrusted with that is clearly ridiculous."

Telegraph (Reino Unido)

 


Otras Notas Relacionadas... ( Records 1 to 10 of 170 )
fecha titulo
29/07/2013 NSA vs. Google: Who Gets to Spy on You
15/05/2013 Europe - Berlin: Germany axes Euro Hawk drone program
14/05/2013 Argentina - Ciudad de Buenos Aires (¿Corrupción?): Cuestionan un contrato del ministro Montenegro
14/05/2013 Argentina - Ciudad de Buenos Aires: Un veterano en esto de reprimir
14/05/2013 Belgium - Brussels: NATO Gets New Supreme Commander
27/04/2012 Colombia - Organización y desempeño policial
19/03/2012 Western Asia - Al Qaeda claims it killed American in Yemen
19/03/2012 Western Asia - Al Qaeda claims it killed American in Yemen
24/10/2011 Taser: La polémica pistola eléctrica
01/10/2011 Russian Firm Cracks 'Impossible' BlackBerry Passwords


Otras Notas del Autor
fecha
Título
06/01/2007|
06/01/2007|

ver + notas
 
Center for the Study of the Presidency
Freedom House