Inteligencia y Seguridad Frente Externo En Profundidad Economia y Finanzas Transparencia
  En Parrilla Medio Ambiente Sociedad High Tech Contacto
En Profundidad  
 
17/07/2011 | What Happens If the United States Fails to Raise the Debt Ceiling?

Nigel Gault

Failure to raise the U.S. federal debt ceiling by the deadline of August 2 would lead to a massive fiscal contraction and a financial crisis, although it would not necessarily mean a debt default.

 

With deficit-reduction negotiations still deadlocked, time is running short to reach an agreement to raise the debt ceiling. Discussions over a 10-year deficit-reduction package—whether "small" at around $2 trillion or "big" at around $4 trillion—have both foundered on the Republicans' insistence that no tax increases are included.

The growing fear that there will be no deal is starkly illustrated by the fact that Senate Minority Leader McConnell (Republican) has proposed a new idea whereby the president could raise the borrowing limit on his own authority (in three stages) without receiving prior approval of matching spending cuts.

This suggests that McConnell is well aware of the train wreck that would result if the debt ceiling is not raised. He has good reason to worry.

When will the debt ceiling become binding? The current Treasury estimate is that the debt ceiling will become binding on August 2—that will be the date on which accounting maneuvers can no longer allow the government to keep spending more than its income without breaching the $14.3-trillion debt ceiling.

When must a debt-ceiling agreement be reached? The administration says that an agreement must be reached by July 22 in time to allow the necessary legislation to be drafted and passed. It is not clear how strict this deadline is.

What happens if the debt ceiling becomes binding? Simply put, the federal government's spending will be limited by its cash flow. Since government revenues fall far short of its spending, this means that there will be an immediate cut of 40–45% in government spending. This cut would amount to around $1.5 trillion at an annual rate (about 10% of GDP). The Treasury would have to decide who gets paid and who does not. We do not know what it would decide—there are no precedents. The first flashpoint would be $23 billion in Social Security payments due on August 3 (which revenues received that day would not cover).

Will the U.S. default? A debt default means that the United States fails to pay interest on its debt or to redeem maturing obligations. Since cash inflows are around $200 billion per month, while interest payments are of the order of $30 billion per month, if the Treasury decided to prioritize interest payments above other payments, it could make them. It could also refinance maturing debt, without raising the overall debt level, assuming that the markets are willing to lend.

What would ratings agencies do if the debt limit became binding? They would put the United States on watch for a downgrade (S&P has already done so). They would probably do this even before August 2. A missed payment on interest or redemptions would definitely mean a downgrade. There might be a downgrade even without missed payments.

What would be the effect on financial markets? For equity markets and the dollar, the impact would be unambiguously negative. Confidence in the ability of the U.S. government to fulfill its most basic responsibilities would be damaged. And the spending contraction, if sustained, would send the economy back into recession.

Interest rates would be expected to rise—but by how much is far from clear. Obviously, debt default or the risk of it would add a risk premium to Treasury yields, but at the same time there would be a massive fiscal contraction driving the economy into recession. And, once the debt ceiling is raised, U.S. Treasuries will probably still be the benchmark market yield, even if not rated AAA. So if interest rates do rise temporarily, investors will anticipate that they will fall back again once the immediate panic is over, which will limit the extent of that rise. This will also mean that short maturities would be hit harder (i.e., interest rates would rise more) than long ones.

But there would be massive dislocation in financial markets, because the recipients of government spending that fail to get priority, and do not get paid, will be unable in turn to meet their own obligations.

Bottom line? Debt default is not necessarily an immediate consequence of failing to raise the debt limit. Catastrophic spending cuts would be an immediate consequence, driving the economy into recession and financial crisis if the debt ceiling were not raised quickly.

The idea that it would be politically possible to implement such cuts for any length of time (beyond a day or so) remains hard to imagine.

Global Insight (Reino Unido)

 


Otras Notas Relacionadas... ( Records 1 to 10 of 3324 )
fecha titulo
17/04/2016 Elecciones EEUU - Trump se desinfla
17/04/2016 GOP nomination process 101: Candidates’ remedial edition
11/04/2016 PEW Explains Who Is Voting For Trump And Why – OpEd
27/03/2016 Trump siempre fue Trump
18/03/2016 Enfoque: La competitividad china en el mundo de Trump
18/03/2016 How Latin Americans see the United States -Dugout diplomacy
18/03/2016 The United States and Latin America - Harmony now, discord later
17/03/2016 Pasión por Donald Trump en su cuartel general
17/03/2016 Trump: rumbo de colisión
17/03/2016 Trump y sus ‘amigos’ hispanos


Otras Notas del Autor
fecha
Título
11/09/2012|
04/08/2012|
29/07/2012|
29/07/2012|
29/07/2012|
29/07/2012|
08/07/2012|
05/05/2012|
30/04/2012|
11/03/2012|
11/03/2012|
05/09/2011|
05/09/2011|
31/07/2011|
31/07/2011|
10/07/2011|
10/07/2011|
04/06/2011|
04/06/2011|
06/05/2011|
06/05/2011|
29/01/2011|
08/01/2011|
10/12/2010|
10/10/2010|
04/09/2010|
04/09/2010|
08/08/2010|
01/08/2010|
03/07/2010|
01/05/2010|
02/04/2010|
07/03/2010|
06/02/2010|
31/01/2010|
08/01/2010|
30/10/2009|
03/10/2009|
06/09/2009|
08/08/2009|
08/08/2009|
01/08/2009|
01/08/2009|
01/11/2008|
01/11/2008|
03/10/2008|
03/10/2008|
08/01/2007|
08/01/2007|
30/07/2006|
05/06/2006|

ver + notas
 
Center for the Study of the Presidency
Freedom House