Government, leading political parties agree to hold referendum in April after nearly a month of unrest.
Chile’s
government and leading political parties agreed to hold a referendum in April
on scuttling the country’s dictatorship-era constitution to replace it with one
that enshrines social rights, a concession to Chileans protesting for broad
public benefits.
The deal
comes after nearly a month of escalating protests as Chileans rose up in a
movement seeking to upend the status quo and implement broad changes that would
include higher public spending on pensions, health care and education. The
constitution, which lays out rights for private business, became a target of
protesters’ ire.
The
Agreement for Social Peace and a New Constitution, announced early Friday,
gives voters the chance to decide whether they want a new constitution and, if
so, whether it should be drafted by members of Congress along with ordinary
Chileans elected for that task or solely by a special constituent assembly made
up of citizens elected to write the document.
The move
seeks to placate demonstrators who have paralyzed the capital, Santiago, with
marches, looting and wanton destruction of subways and other public property.
Other cities have also been rocked by protests. At least 23 people have died,
and damages have been estimated at $2 billion, tarnishing Chile’s image as a
tranquil, prosperous country.
“This
accord is a first step, but it’s a historic first step and fundamental to begin
to build a new social pact,” Gonzalo Blumel, the interior minister, told
reporters Friday at the presidential palace shortly after the agreement was
reached.
Supporters
of the current constitution, which was enacted in 1980 during the military
dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet, say it has been the pillar for Chile’s robust
economic growth. Critics say the constitution—the latest of three Chile has had
over the past 180 years—is illegitimate because it originated under his iron
rule. Those demanding a new one want it to enshrine the right to state
benefits, such as health care and pensions.
Since
the end of the Pinochet regime in 1990, Chile has carried out constitutional
amendments that led to the creation of a constitutional tribunal, an
independent attorney general’s office, and other changes that solidified
democracy.
If
Chileans decide the constitution should be replaced, they would in October of
next year select those who will produce a draft of the new constitution, which
will then be put up for a final vote.
Markets
across the region reacted positively to the latest developments. Chile’s stocks
jumped more than 6% around midday, while the peso gained 3.1% against the
dollar. Elsewhere, the Mexican peso and the Colombian peso strengthened against
the greenback.
“I think
it’s a great step,” said Marta Lagos, a pollster and political analyst. She
said a new constitution would serve as the final transition to democracy from
the Pinochet years.
But Ms.
Lagos said that demonstrators, who have already won concessions from the
government in nearly a month of protests, are demanding action to resolve a
range of social issues that cannot wait until a new constitution goes into
effect.
“Political
guarantees are not enough,” she said. “Without social guarantees, there won’t
be social peace. There could be a truce but not peace.”
She and
other analysts have said the government needs to consider social spending.
“That spending needs to be immediate,” she said.
What had
started as demonstrations against an increase in subway fares quickly morphed
into marches, some of them numbering hundreds of thousands of people. The
protesters are angry about low pensions, shoddy schools and inadequate health
services. Chileans have also called for changes to an economic system that
offers low taxes to corporations and has permitted the privatizations of what
had been public services.
Pollster
Cadem said Monday in a new poll that 52% of Chileans want to change the
constitution, which prohibits public workers from striking and includes strong
protections for private property, even allowing for private ownership of water
from rivers and other waterways.
***Juan
Forero at Juan.Forero@wsj.com